NoGovInternet Launches Campaign Against Government-Owned Broadband in Utah

November 16, 2023

Today, NoGovInternet.com announced a campaign to defend Utahans from the unneeded, unwanted expansion of government-owned networks like UTOPIA. City-run networks put taxpayers, city budgets, bond-ratings, and consumers at risk.


In a press statement, the campaign said, “The track record of these government-owned networks is disrupted service, higher taxes and fees, lower government bond ratings, years-long wait times, and fleeced taxpayers. Oftentimes, these assets are sold off to private companies for pennies per tax dollar invested.”


“Despite the failure of these city-owned networks, some bureaucrats and politicians continue to seek city, state, and federal tax dollars on a big-government agenda to own the network.’ When government owns the network, it also owns the internet. This is an affront to our principles of free market capitalism and poses a threat to our individual liberties and personal freedoms.”


“Over the course of the next six weeks, we will run a seven-figure statewide media campaign to educate the public on the failure of these government-owned networks and the dangers of a government-owned internet. We are appealing to citizens, activists of all political parties, elected officials, thought leaders, think tanks – indeed, everyone who believes that the private marketplace is more reliable, capable, and dependable to manage a free, safe and secure internet than cities and government bureaucracy.”


No Gov Internet’s first television ad can be viewed here: “Not What They Do


More information is available at NoGovInternet.com.

September 12, 2025
Right click on the image to download.
September 12, 2025
Right click on the image to download.
September 12, 2025
Right click on the image to download.
September 8, 2025
Right click on the image to download.
August 20, 2025
Right click on the image to download.
October 10, 2024
No Gov Internet Spokesperson penned an op-ed for the St. George News. The letter asks a critical question: should we risk millions of taxpayer dollars on a venture that could compromise essential public services?